Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Autry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1927No. 17151; 17152PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Assuming that a property owner whose land is traversed by a highway is under no duty to alter conditions existing upon the land before the dedication of the highway, so as to render his abutting property safe for travel by persons using the highway, yet where, after the establishment of the highway over his land, a pre-existing condition on the land, which consisted of a deep and wide hole in the ground, became altered by the hole being in the highway and being connected with a shallow ditch or drain in the actually traveled roadway, and there was thus created a condition in both the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. JoynerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Autry v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hightower v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Greenfield v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Sweet v. AwtryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. Georgia Power Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API