Legal Opinion · Concurrence

North Pacific Insurance v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1998No. 95-CV-0461-AB; CA A94301Published

1ConcurrenceWarren, P. J.

I agree with the majority and the trial court that North Pacific’s policy may and does limit its liability limits to the statutory minimum of $25,000 with respect to plaintiff. I do not agree that the balance of the majority opinion’s analysis is correct or necessary.

The trial court was correct that ORS 742.544 does not apply because that statute deals with reimbursement. Here, there was no reimbursement but a pro tanto reduction of available limits based on payments made under PIP. The policy provides:

“Any payments made by us under this insurance to an insured shall be applied in reduction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Edwards v. Bonneville Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. United Services Automobile Assn. v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API