Legal Opinion

United Services Automobile Assn. v. Reilly

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1993No. 9008-05010; CA A71742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

In this declaratory judgment action, defendant Nygaard appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for plaintiff, United Services Automobile Association (USAA). We affirm.

USAA issued a motor vehicle liability policy to defendant Reilly, 2 which became effective on February 1,1988, and remained effective until August 1,1988. The policy contained the following “business use” exclusion:

“A. We do not provide liability coverage for any person:

❖ Hs Hí

“6. While employed or otherwise engaged in the business or occupation of:

^ H< Hi Hi

“e. parking
“vehicles designed for use…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Collins v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Viking Insurance v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Viking Insurance v. PerottiOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. VIKING INS. CO. OF WIS. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marcus v. Hanover Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  2. Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  3. Proformance Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API