Legal Opinion

Hoppe v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1970No. 41432PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The appellant, Harley H. Hoppe, a resident and taxpayer of the state, initiated this declaratory judgment action pursuant to RCW 7.24 seeking a determination that Laws of 1969, ch. 3, p. 12, violated Const. art. 28, § 1. The trial court continued a hearing on the matter to permit the appellant to make a demand upon the Attorney General to prosecute the action. The Attorney General refused and, thereafter, filed a motion for summary judgment on behalf of the State of Washington, as respondent. The trial court granted respondent’s motion upon the grounds that Laws of 1969, ch. 3, p. 12, is not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Peay v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. McCuistionWashington Supreme Court · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API