Legal Opinion

State v. Stanley

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1979No. 6399PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

OGATA, J.

Defendant-appellant Jack Lee Stanley (hereinafter appellant) challenges the constitutionality of the family court waiver of jurisdiction statute, HRS § 571-22 (1976), both on its face and as applied. This appeal results from appellant’s conviction after a jury trial on charges of both murder 1 and robbery in the first degree. 2 We find no constitutional infirmity with respect to HRS § 571-22 (1976), and we therefore affirm the conviction.

Appellant was 16 years old at the time of the commission of these offenses. Proceedings were initiated against appellant on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Harbert v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. OwensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. A JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. RauchHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. CottoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People of the Territory of Guam v. William E. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. State v. EnglishHawaii Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API