State v. Stanley
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
OGATA, J.
Defendant-appellant Jack Lee Stanley (hereinafter appellant) challenges the constitutionality of the family court waiver of jurisdiction statute, HRS § 571-22 (1976), both on its face and as applied. This appeal results from appellant’s conviction after a jury trial on charges of both murder 1 and robbery in the first degree. 2 We find no constitutional infirmity with respect to HRS § 571-22 (1976), and we therefore affirm the conviction.
Appellant was 16 years old at the time of the commission of these offenses. Proceedings were initiated against appellant on…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Harbert v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. OwensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- A JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. RauchHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. CottoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- People of the Territory of Guam v. William E. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State v. EnglishHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.