Legal Opinion

People of the Territory of Guam v. William E. Kingsbury

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1981No. 79-1585PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a decision of the District Court of Guam, Appellate Division, affirming a Guam juvenile court decision certifying the appellant, William Kings-bury, to stand trial as an adult. Because Kingsbury was seventeen years old at the time of the alleged crime, he was originally brought before the juvenile court in Guam. Guam Code Civ.Proc. §§ 251, 252. The juvenile court, after a hearing on Kingsbury’s amenability to treatment as a juvenile ruled, pursuant to Guam Code Civ. Proc. § 255, that the appellant should stand trial as an adult. Appellant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino VillacrusisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. C.G.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Gerald N., JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Willie Lee Girtman v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API