United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
The central issue in these consolidated appeals by allowance is whether the relinquishment, during collective bargaining, of a scheduled, future salary increase for employees, in return for a lump-sum payment by the employer into a pension fund for current and future retirees, constitutés an employee “contribution” to such fund for purposes of Pennsylvania’s unemployment compensation statute and applicable federal law.
United States Steel Corporation (“Employer”) contributes to, and maintains, the Carnegie Pension Plan (the “Plan”) for retired employees. Employer’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Danielle Viktor, Ltd. v. Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Slippery Rock Area School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Goods v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Lehigh-Northampton Airport Authority v. Lehigh County Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- MBB Realty Ltd. Partnership v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (In re Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.