Danielle Viktor, Ltd. v. Department of Labor & Industry
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
In this case, we determine whether individuals who drive limousines (Drivers) for six limousine companies (Appellees) are independent contractors or employees pursuant to Section 43 P.S. § 753©(2)(B) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. §§ 751-914. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the Orders of the Commonwealth Court that held that Drivers are independent contractors and, accordingly, that Appellant, the Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Employer Tax Operations (Department), erred by characterizing Drivers as employees and imposing unemployment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Venango Newspapers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Krum v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. Hecker & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Lerch v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Beacon Flag Car Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Glatfelter Barber Shop v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Minelli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.