Legal Opinion

Danielle Viktor, Ltd. v. Department of Labor & Industry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 2006No. 10-15 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NEWMAN.

In this case, we determine whether individuals who drive limousines (Drivers) for six limousine companies (Appellees) are independent contractors or employees pursuant to Section 43 P.S. § 753©(2)(B) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. §§ 751-914. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the Orders of the Commonwealth Court that held that Drivers are independent contractors and, accordingly, that Appellant, the Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Employer Tax Operations (Department), erred by characterizing Drivers as employees and imposing unemployment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Venango Newspapers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Krum v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. Hecker & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Lerch v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Beacon Flag Car Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Glatfelter Barber Shop v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Minelli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API