Legal Opinion

Hart v. Kerr

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1946No. 6938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment upon a directed verdict of no cause of action. A similar verdict was directed as to the counterclaim, but the defendant does- not appeal therefrom.

The action was initiated in the City Court of Ogden City by a complaint in negligence for damage to plaintiff’s automobile in the sum of $750. Defendant counterclaimed in negligence for damage to his automobile of $617.14 and personal loss and injury in the sum of $997 or a total of $1669.14. Recognizing that the City Court had no jurisdiction of the counterclaim the parties stipulated that the case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smalley v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Checketts v. CollingsUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Cederloff v. WhitedUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Christensen v. Utah Rapid Transit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nataros v. Fine Arts Gallery of Scottsdale, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Horsley v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Hayden v. CederlundUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hayden v. CederlundUtah Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API