Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Utah Rapid Transit Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1933No. 5292PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolland, J.

This is an action for damages to plaintiff’s automobile which was injured by being driven over a switch standard located between defendant’s railroad tracks in about the center of Washington avenue near Second street, in Ogden, Utah. The cause was tried to a jury in the district court of Weber county. At the close of the evidence plaintiff and defendant each made a motion for a directed verdict. The motion of plaintiff was denied, and that of defendant granted. From a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the directed verdict of no cause of action, plaintiff appeals.

The facts briefly…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cruz v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Finlayson v. BradyUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Sullivan v. Beneficial Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Nielsen v. Christensen-Gardner, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hart v. KerrUtah Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API