Legal Opinion
Shehee v. Luttrell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1999No. 98-5614PublishedCited by 1,663 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants are prison employees or officials of the Federal Correctional Institute at Manchester, Kentucky (“FCI-Manchester”), or officials employed by the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). Plaintiff-Appellee Kevin L. Shehee filed a Bivens suit against the defendants, alleging various violations of his constitutional rights. Defendants now appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss and/or summary judgment based on qualified immunity. For the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,663 opinions
- Grinter v. KnightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Carolyn Comstock v. Norris McCrary v. S. Thyagarajan and David HowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Everson v. LeisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Phillips v. Roane County, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Robert L. Smith, Jr. v. Donal Campbell, Warden Janice Buchanan Kay WinklerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
1,658 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.