Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Adams

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1900No. 2,865PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Madison Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

—A demurrer to the complaint of the appellee against the appellant for want of sufficient facts was overruled in the Henry Circuit Court, where this cause was commenced. An answer in denial was filed, and the venue was then changed to the court below, where the cause was tried by jury, and a general verdict was returned in favor of the appellee for $3,000, and judgment was rendered accordingly.

In the complaint there were allegations describing at length the location of the appellant’s railway tracks and the surroundings, in the town of New Castle. It was shown that a street in said town known…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wabash Railroad v. EnglemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. VoghtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Dahlquist v. Denver & R. G. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Princeton Coal Co. v. DowdleIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. DerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API