Legal Opinion

Plott v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

For the purpose of providing better school advantages in Waynesville Township, the General Assembly, at the session of 1923, passed a public-local act which was to become effective when ratified by a majority of the qualified voters of the township (P.-L. L. 1923, ch. 350) ; but the appellants say that the act has not been approved and is not in force, and that the election which they attack was held under the provisions of the codified laws relating to public schools. Public Laws 1923, ch. 136. The appeal will be treated upon this assumption.

The action was brought to contest the validity of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mobile v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Jones v. Commissioners of Person CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Hyatt v. Dehart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Jones v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. State Ex Rel. Quinn v. LattimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Branch v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Mewborn v. . KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Penland v. Town of Bryson CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. McPherson v. City Council of City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API