State Ex Rel. Quinn v. Lattimore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN of quo wcvrranto by the State, on the relation of J. H. Quinn against T. D. Lattimore, to tiy the title to the office of Clerk of the Superior Court of Cleveland county, heard., on exceptions by both parties, to the report of the referee, before Bryan, J., at Spring Term, 1896, of Cleveland Superior Court. His Honor gave judgment for the •defendant and both parries appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Fueches, J.:
This is an action of quo warranto brought for the purpose of trying the title to the office of Clerk of the Superior Court of Cleveland county, resulting from the election of 1894. The case was referred by consent to Armstead Burwell, who filed his report to Spring Term, 1896, to which the defendant filed fifty-seven exceptions, and the plaintiff, by way of asignment of error, filed thirty-seven. The case presented to this court on appeal, including the report of referee, the Judge’s findings, exceptions and briefs, contains 368 pages of printed matter.
According to the referee’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wittkowsky v. WassonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General Ex Rel. Boyer v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Southerland v. Board of Aldermen of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Norment v. . City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- McDonald v. . MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Kirby v. Stokes County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Woodall v. Western Wake Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Lane v. BaileyMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Davis v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.