Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 17, 1961No. 37PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The petitioner was convicted for having unlawfully refused to answer a question pertinent to a matter under inquiry before a subcommittee of the House Committee on Un-American Activities at a hearing in Atlanta, *401Georgia, on July 30, 1958.1 His conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, which held that our decision in Barenblatt v. United States, 360 U. S. 109, was “controlling.” 272 F. 2d 783. We granted certiorari, 362 U. S. 926, to consider the petitioner’s claim that the Court of Appeals had misconceived the meaning of the Baren-blatt decision. For the reasons that follow, we are of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barenblatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Watkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Frank Wilkinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Baird v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API