Legal Opinion
In Re Carr
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 14, 1998No. B124150PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
Defendant, Mark Anthony Carr, has filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the award of presentence conduct credits he received in a case where he was placed on probation. Purportedly pursuant to Penal Code 1 section 2933.1, defendant was awarded only 15 percent conduct credits against the time actually spent in custody. We conclude that the 15 percent limitation on preprobation and sentence conduct credits in section 2933.1 is inapplicable when the accused is placed on probation. We therefore issue our writ of habeas corpus.
II. Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. HarperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. Arevalo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In Re BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.