Webb v. Carter's Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
GARY ALLEN FEESS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Lindsey Webb, Anastasia Booth, Kina Abrams, Jayme Sanchez, Amy Muir, and Nancy Muir (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative nationwide class action lawsuit against defendants Carter’s, Inc. (“Carter’s”); Avery Dennison, Inc. (“Avery”); Pacific Concept Industries (USA), LLC (“PCI USA”); and Pacific Concepts Industries Limited (“PCI Hong Kong”).1 (Docket No. 144, Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”).) This suit arises out of an alleged failure to disclose and provide adequate…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Dz Reserve v. Meta Platforms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Townsend v. Monster Beverage Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Bruno v. Quten Research Institute, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.