Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Quten Research Institute, LLC

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 14, 2011No. SACV 11-00173 DOC(Ex)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion for Class Certification filed by Plaintiff Kelley Bruno (“Plaintiff’). (Dkt. 47) (also under seal at Dkt. 61). After considering the moving papers and oral argument, the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs motion for class certification. The Court DENIES the motion only to the extent that Plaintiffs seek to include within the class those persons who were exclusively exposed to the “3X” representation.

I. Background

Plaintiff filed a Complaint on January…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. Donohue v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Cortina v. Goya Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
  5. Astiana v. Kashi Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API