Wisconsin v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
Respondent Todd Mitchell’s sentence for aggravated battery was enhanced because he intentionally selected his victim on account of the victim’s race. The question presented in this case is whether this penalty enhancement is prohibited by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. We hold that it is not.
On the evening of October 7,1989, a group of young black men and boys, including Mitchell, gathered at an apartment complex in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Several members of the group discussed a scene from the motion picture “Mississippi Burning,” in which a white man beat a young black boy who was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by523 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
518 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.