East Hempfield Township v. Brubaker
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
Appellants (hereafter Brubaker) appeal from a final decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County denying Brubaker’s motion for post-trial relief and entering as final a decree nisi allowing Brubaker use of its communications tower until such time that East Hempfield Township (Township) either relocates the tower or removes it and provides Brubaker with equivalent communications technology. On appeal Brubaker contends that the trial court erred in granting the Township unilateral authority to declare that the tower poses a risk to the safety and welfare…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Petrosky v. ZON. BD., UPPER CHICHESTER TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Highland Park Community v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. BlickleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Northview Motors, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Three Rivers Youth v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kuszyk v. Zoning Hearing Board of Amity TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Murray, H. v. Willistown TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Nace v. New Cumberland Zoning Hearing Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County2013