Legal Opinion

Mazur v. Trinity Area School District

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Edward M. Mazur, Jeffrey W. Bull, and Citizens Against Tax Increment Financing (Citizens) appeal an order of the Washington County Court of Common Pleas (trial court) sustaining the preliminary objections of several local taxing districts1 to their six consolidated actions. Each action challenged the use of tax increment financing for a commercial development project in South Strabane Township, Washington County. In three, Citizens appealed resolutions adopted by Washington County, the Trinity Area School District and South Strabane Township to participate in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fischer v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SwiftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Schenck v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Sovich v. ShaughnessyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Mazur v. Washington County Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. C.M. Bradley v. West Chester University FoundationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Carlino East Brandywine, L.P. v. East Brandywine Twp. Appeal of: Brandywine Village AssociatesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Community College of Philadelphia v. Faculty and Staff Federation of the Community College of Philadelphia, Local 2026, AFT, AFL-CIOCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API