State v. Sims

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

Essex Sims directly appeals the summary denial of his pro se motion to correct an illegal sentence. He asserts five claims of error. Four challenge his convictions, not his sentence, and the fifth contends the district court’s order was unclear as to whether his sentences were consecutive or concurrent. We affirm the district court’s summary denial. A motion to correct an illegal sentence cannot be used to challenge a conviction, so the four claims at*822tacking his convictions are not properly raised. See State v. Deal, 286 Kan. 528, Syl. ¶ 2,…