State v. Morningstar
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Biles, J.:
This appeal concerns a consecutive sentence ordered after an appellate remand in a multiple-conviction case. See State v. Morningstar, 289 Kan. 488, 495, 213 P.3d 1045 (2009) (Morningstar I). The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because it determined it was without jurisdiction because the new sentence was within the presumptive range under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA). See State v. Morningstar, No. 103,433, 2011 WL 1878003, at *2 (Kan. App. 2011) (unpublished opinion) (Morningstar II); see also K.S.A. 21-4721(c)(1) (no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- State v. HuertaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. GuderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. MorningstarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. QuestedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. DullSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.