Legal Opinion

State v. Duke

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 31, 1997No. 77,677, No. 77,787PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, C.J.:

In this consolidated appeal, each defendant appeals from the denial of identical (except for names and dates) motions to correct illegal sentences. Each defendant contends: (1) The notice to seek imposition of the hard 40 sentence was untimely; and (2) the district court erred in not appointing counsel and holding a hearing on his motion.

BACKGROUND FACTS

Shane A. Duke was convicted of first-degree murder and other felonies arising from the January 19, 1993, slaying of his landlord, Charles Pettigrew. He received a hard 40 sentence for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. RuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State v. DeaversSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. State v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. State v. ScherzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. PhinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. MoodySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. HogeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API