Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Aramco Services Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 9, 1987No. 1 CA-CIV 8657PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s orders granting appellees’ motions to dismiss. Two issues are presented for our review: (1) whether the trial court had personal jurisdiction over appellees Aramco Services Company (ASC) and Arabian-American Oil Company (Aramco), and (2) whether appellants’ claim against Aramco is barred by the statute of limitations. We conclude that the trial court properly dismissed the complaint based on lack of personal jurisdiction over ASC and Aramco, and affirm the trial court’s decision. Therefore, we do not decide whether the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bohreer v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Rollin v. William v. Frankel & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Williams v. Lakeview Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- A. UBERTI AND C. v. LeonardoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Bert Martinez v. Beatrice Lynn Duarte, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.