Legal Opinion
Williams v. Lakeview Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 4, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 98-0548PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Judge.
¶ 1 Michelyn and Kelly Williams appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their complaint against Lakeview Company, which does business as the Gold Strike Inn, and other defendants (collectively, “Lakeview”) for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the reasons explained below, we reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Plaintiffs Kelly and Michelyn Williams, passengers in a car driven by Patrick Kelsey, sustained serious injuries in a single-car accident when returning from a trip to Defendant Lakeview’s Gold Strike Inn and Casino in Nevada. Plaintiffs allege that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. Lakeview Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Rollin v. William v. Frankel & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Williams v. Lakeview Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Williams v. Lakeview Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000