Rollin v. William v. Frankel & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this putative class action, plaintiffs/appellants Lawrence S. Rollin and J. William and Barbara Mandelbaum appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint against defendants/appellees William V. Frankel & Co. (Frankel) and Hill, Thompson, Magid & Co. (HTM) for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 This action arises out of the purchase and sale of worthless public stock in a company called Discovery Zone. On July 29,1997, a bankruptcy court extinguished all of Discovery Zone’s publicly owned stock pursuant to a confirmed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Garza v. Swift Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Robert a Hansen Family Trust v. Fgh Industries, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Bentley v. Zensano, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Van Heeswyk v. Jabiru Aircraft Pty., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Holland v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.