Legal Opinion

Rollin v. William v. Frankel & Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 23, 2000No. 2 CA-CV 99-0164PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this putative class action, plaintiffs/appellants Lawrence S. Rollin and J. William and Barbara Mandelbaum appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint against defendants/appellees William V. Frankel & Co. (Frankel) and Hill, Thompson, Magid & Co. (HTM) for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 This action arises out of the purchase and sale of worthless public stock in a company called Discovery Zone. On July 29,1997, a bankruptcy court extinguished all of Discovery Zone’s publicly owned stock pursuant to a confirmed…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Garza v. Swift Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Robert a Hansen Family Trust v. Fgh Industries, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Bentley v. Zensano, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Van Heeswyk v. Jabiru Aircraft Pty., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Holland v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API