Legal Opinion

Bair v. Hagans

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 13, 1992No. 01-91-00898-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNN, Justice.

As a sanction for discovery abuse, the trial court dismissed with prejudice Shari Bair, Peter Voskamp, and Jerry Amussen’s (appellants) suit against William Fred Ha-gans, Hagans & Sydow, Sewell and Riggs, Barry Abrams, William Matthews, and Clyde Wilson (appellees). In nine points of error, appellants challenge the trial court’s order of dismissal on the grounds that: 1) the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing appellants’ cause of action; 2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motion for new trial; 3) the trial court erred in dismissing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United Business MacHine, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Media, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. Lawson v. MuckleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Scott Bader, Inc. v. Sandstone Products, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  2. Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  3. Andras v. Memorial Hospital System, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  4. Lewis v. Western Waste Industries, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  5. Westfall Family Farms, Inc. v. King Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API