Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Muckley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1992No. 01-91-00130-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TREVATHAN, Chief Justice.

As a sanction for discovery abuse, the trial court struck appellant, Sandra Lawson’s, pleadings and dismissed her suit against appellee, Harold J. Muckley. In three points of error, appellant challenges the trial court’s order of dismissal on the grounds that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing appellant’s cause of action, (2) the trial court’s dismissal of her case exceeded proper bounds of discretion, and (3) the trial court abused its discretion in denying her motion for new trial. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal.

The following is a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United Business MacHine, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Media, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bair v. Hagans, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  2. Cole v. Huntsville Memorial Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API