Legal Opinion

Westfall Family Farms, Inc. v. King Ranch, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 4, 1993No. 05-92-00262-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

This is a death penalty sanction ease. 1 The trial court granted King Ranch’s motion to strike the Westfalls’ answer and entered default judgment against the Westfalls. We conclude the trial court abused its discretion in entering a death penalty sanction before applying lesser sanctions. We reverse the trial court’s judgment. We remand this cause for a new trial.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The underlying lawsuit arises out of a cattle feeding agreement between King Ranch and the Westfalls. In November 1988, King Ranch sued the Westfalls for breach of the agreement.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Tyson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  2. Williams v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1999
  3. Jones v. Andrews, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  4. Union Carbide Corp. v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  5. 46933, Inc. v. Z & B Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API