Westfall Family Farms, Inc. v. King Ranch, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Justice.
This is a death penalty sanction ease. 1 The trial court granted King Ranch’s motion to strike the Westfalls’ answer and entered default judgment against the Westfalls. We conclude the trial court abused its discretion in entering a death penalty sanction before applying lesser sanctions. We reverse the trial court’s judgment. We remand this cause for a new trial.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The underlying lawsuit arises out of a cattle feeding agreement between King Ranch and the Westfalls. In November 1988, King Ranch sued the Westfalls for breach of the agreement.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Tyson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Williams v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1999
- Jones v. Andrews, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- 46933, Inc. v. Z & B Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.