Legal Opinion
Savant v. Lincoln Engineering
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 11, 1995No. 66269PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRANDALL, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Robert Savant and Lois Savant, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, in favor of defendant, Lincoln Engineering. We affirm.
The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, established that on April 3, 1989, plaintiff, 1 was employed by St. Louis Freightliner (Freightliner) as a journeyman mechanic, repairing over-the-road tractor trailers. He was assisting another mechanic in the installation of a transmission. They were using a hydraulic jack to raise and support the transmission. The jack was lowered by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Burlington Northern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Murphy v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- McJunkins v. Windham Power Lifts, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Edmonds v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Golden v. ChipmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sappington v. Skyjack, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Pollard v. WhitenerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Kusek v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
- Henson ex rel. Lincoln v. Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Heitman v. Heartland Regional Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.