Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jones v. Laughlin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Application for prohibition.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

This is an application for a writ to restrain respondent, who is judge of the St. Louis Criminal Court, from proceeding propi-io motu to disbar the relator.

The return of respondent sets forth that, having reason to believe from facts that appeared in evidence before him *2that relator, who is an attorney of the St. Louis Criminal Court, had been guilty of duplicity towards the court, and of wilfully abusing its process, and that he had thereby caused great and needless expense in the trial of a certain cause in said court, the respondent, as judge of said court, of his own motion, caused…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Case of AustinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  3. Ex parte SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Beene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
  5. Jackson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. In re the Disbarment of SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Kochtitzky v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. In Re Disbarment of SizerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  5. In re MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API