Legal Opinion

In re Mills

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1850PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the court,

Wnipp'LE, C.'J.

This ease comes before the court upon question's reserved by the circuit judge of the county of Kent.

Charges, affecting the professional and Moral character of the respondent, were filed by Charles P. Babcock against Mills, in the circuit court of the county of Kent. Among these charges were the following:

1. “ That said Mills is of notoriously had character, not to be believed tinder oath, and unworthy to practice' as an attorney.”

2. “ That the reputation of said Mills for truth and veracity is so notoriously had, that ho is not to be believed under oath.”

Testimony…

2Cited by47 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Bar Ass'n v. GreenhoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API