Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Sizer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 30, 1924PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

The record in this case is of tedious length — 1719 printed pages. We say tedious, because there is so much useless matter which proves nothing. Both sides have been guilty, and hence the freedom of criticism. With it all, it should be said that the oral combats between counsel have furnished spice, which rendered interesting the reading of the two printed volumes. The only regret is the evidence here and there evinces a little feeling. There should be none in a case entitled as is this one. On the face of the pleadings the case appears to be one in the name of the officers of the Kansas City…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Selleck v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Jones v. LaughlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Jones v. SandersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. In Re MitgangIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Dombey, Tyler, Richards & Grieser v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. In Re McCulloughUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Grievance Committee v. NevasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API