Legal Opinion

State v. Klein

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 2010No. 070331537, A136435PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, arguing that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence found on his person. Defendant argues that the arresting officer unlawfully extended a lawful traffic stop by asking defendant questions about drugs that were unrelated to the stop; that the officer unlawfully expanded the subject matter of the traffic stop by asking those questions without reasonable suspicion that defendant possessed drugs; and that defendant’s consent to the search of his person was the unattenuated product of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. KirkebyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. MacielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. KentoppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. GomesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. KimmonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API