Legal Opinion

State v. Maciel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 16, 2013No. 092084AFE; A145086PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress drug-related evidence obtained during an unlawful stop. We review for legal error whether a police officer’s interaction with an individual amounts to an unlawful seizure under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. State v. Smith, 252 Or App 518, 519, 287 P3d 1210 (2012). We conclude that the drug-related evidence should have been suppressed and, accordingly, reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are undisputed.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. Juarez-GodinezOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BeltOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. AylesOregon Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. BarberMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. KimmonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API