Legal Opinion

State v. Kentopp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 2012No. 094119FE; A145415PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained during an unlawful extension of a lawful traffic stop. Reviewing the denial of the motion to suppress for legal error and deferring to the trial court’s findings of historical fact if there is evidence to support them, State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75, 854 P2d 421 (1993), we conclude that the evidence should have been suppressed, and, accordingly, we reverse and remand.

While he was sitting in his patrol car in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. MitcheleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MacielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. KimmonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. Espinoza-BarraganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API