Legal Opinion

Heath v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FLAHERTY.1

Kim Heath (Claimant) petitions for review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting Claimant benefits for a psychological injury that she alleged arose from abnormal working conditions. We affirm the Board.

Claimant was employed by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Employer) as a parole agent at Graterford Prison (Graterford). Claimant’s immediate supervisor at Graterford was Calvin Ogletree, Jr. (Ogletree), whose immediate supervisor was James…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Schweitzer v. Rockwell InternationalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Kohler v. McCrory StoresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heath v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Heath v. WCAB (PA BD. OF PRO. AND PAR.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. M & B Inn Partners, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Edwards v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API