Kohler v. McCrory Stores
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*134OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
The question before this Court is whether an employee can set forth a valid cause of action against his employer under the personal animus exception to the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (“Act”),1 for non-work-related injuries inflicted by a co-worker solely for personal reasons, where the injured employee has previously accepted benefits pursuant to the Act. We hold that only a final adjudication of work-relatedness can estop an employee from asserting that his injuries are not work-related for purposes of maintaining an action against his employer…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Neil E. JONES Robert E. Jones, Appellant v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Rue v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Ducaji v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Theodore v. Delaware Valley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.