Legal Opinion

Kohler v. McCrory Stores

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1992No. 009 M.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*134OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

The question before this Court is whether an employee can set forth a valid cause of action against his employer under the personal animus exception to the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (“Act”),1 for non-work-related injuries inflicted by a co-worker solely for personal reasons, where the injured employee has previously accepted benefits pursuant to the Act. We hold that only a final adjudication of work-relatedness can estop an employee from asserting that his injuries are not work-related for purposes of maintaining an action against his employer…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Neil E. JONES Robert E. Jones, Appellant v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Rue v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Ducaji v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Theodore v. Delaware Valley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API