Legal Opinion
Heath v. WCAB (PA BD. OF PRO. AND PAR.)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 25, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
811 A.2d 90 (2002)
Kim HEATH, Petitioner,
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE), Respondent.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted on Briefs June 14, 2002.
Decided November 25, 2002.
Eugene Mattioni, Philadelphia, for petitioner.
Audrey J. Copeland, Newtown Square, for respondent.
BEFORE: FRIEDMAN, Judge, LEAVITT, Judge, and FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.
OPINION BY Senior Judge FLAHERTY.[1]
Kim Heath (Claimant) petitions for review of a decision of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Judge…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Schweitzer v. Rockwell InternationalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Kohler v. McCrory StoresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heath v. WCAB (BD. OF PROB. AND PAR.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Cantarella v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Cantarella v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003