Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Samuel Edwards (Claimant) petitions for review of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the denial of Claimant’s claim petition by a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ). Claimant alleged that he sustained injury to his lower back, left testicle and right leg when he was grabbed by his assistant supervisor and body slammed onto a table.

I

The questions Claimant states are (1) whether the WCJ and the Board erred in concluding that Claimant was sexually harassed where he did not believe, perceive or allege that he was sexually harassed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Heath v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Cleland Simpson Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Gunter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Bachman Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. M & B Inn Partners, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Thomas v. Galgon, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API