Daytona Bridge Co. v. Bond
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by the court Bn Banc. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Volusia county. The facts in the' case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, J.
— The defendants in error, Frank E.' Bond and J. B. Conrad, as co-partners under the firm name of the Bond Lumber Company, brought an action of assumpsit in the Circuit Court of Volusia county against the plaintiff in error, the Daytona Bridge Company, a corporation, in the j^ear 1901, and recovered judgment for the sum of $321.13, damages, and $26.03, costs, on the 17th day of April, 1902, which judgment plaintiff in error seeks to have reversed by writ of error.. Omitting formal parts the declaration in the case was as follows: “Frank E. Bond and J. B. Conrad, co-partners under the firm…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Martyn v. J. E. Amold & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Jacksonville Street Railroad v. WaltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
- Field v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Harrison v. FrinkSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- General Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Merchants Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Dudas v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Poppell v. CulpepperSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.