Legal Opinion

Hoodless v. Jernigan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1906PublishedCited by 28 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, C. J.

The defendant in error as plaintiff brought an action of ejectment against the plaintiff in error as defendant in the Circuit Court far Santa Rosa county to recover the possession of a certain described tract of land and for mesne profits. A trial was had at the Spring term, 1905, of said court, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, to which judgment the defendant took a writ of error returnable to the present term.

This is the second time this case has been brought here by the defendant. See Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 South. Rep. 656. That judgment was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Illinois Cent. R. v. Board of Levee Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. Volusia County Bank v. BigelowSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  4. Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  5. Markey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. McKinnon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  3. Putnal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Jacksonville Electric Co. v. BowdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  5. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API