Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Slavin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1969No. 40476PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This is an action for declaratory judgment to determine the constitutionality of an appropriation contained in chapter 143 of the Laws of 1967, Extraordinary Session. The appropriation is in the amount of $250,000, and was provided in the following language:

Planning and Community Affairs Agency

Motor Vehicle Fund Appropriation to assist metropolitan municipal corporations to make the planning, engineering, financial and feasibility studies incident to the preparation of a comprehensive public transportation plan; it is the intent of the legislature, in providing for these studies, to promote…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Yelle v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Jensen v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Malyon v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Anderson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1975

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API