Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Thalhimer Bros., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1993No. 9121SC814PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

We note at the onset that we are in our discretion addressing the merits of the defendants’ first argument pursuant to Rule 2 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. The issue has not been raised properly. As a result of incorrect pagination, the page stating the argument and referencing the assignment of error has been omitted. Ordinarily, if a party fails to include references to the assignment of error, the question is deemed abandoned and will not be considered on appeal. However, “[t]o prevent manifest injustice to a party, or to expedite a decision in the public…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Waddle v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Bolick v. American Barmag Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Soderlund v. KuchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Graham v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Williamson v. LiptzinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. McDougal-Wilson v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API