Legal Opinion
O'Neil v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 9, 2013No. 09C11417; A143429PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
Plaintiff was convicted and sentenced in Oregon, but was later transferred to an Oklahoma prison pursuant to the Interstate Corrections Compact (ICC) Act, ORS 421.245, where he alleges he was mistreated. Plaintiff filed a lengthy complaint against the Oregon Department of Corrections (Oregon DOC) and some of its employees and the Oklahoma Department of Corrections (Oklahoma DOC) and some of its employees, in total naming more than three dozen defendants. The trial court resolved the claims on motions to dismiss under ORCP 21 A. The Oklahoma defendants sought dismissal under ORCP 21 A(2) on…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alfieri v. SolomonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Wallace v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Swank v. Terex Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.