Herinckx v. Sanelle
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a limited judgment dismissing their claim against defendant Stancorp Financial Group, Inc., dba Standard Insurance Company (Standard). Plaintiffs raise two assignments of error. First, they contend that the trial court erred by granting Standard’s motion to dismiss based on its determination, as applied here, that ORS 112.515 (part of Oregon’s so-called “slayer statutes”) is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1973 (ERISA). Because, as applied here, ORS 112.515 is “related to” an “employee benefit plan,” we hold that ERISA preempts the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Altria Group, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Doe v. Lake Oswego School DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Laborers' Pension Fund v. MiscevicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Dept. of Human Services v. HobartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- RLF Liquidating, LLC v. McDonald Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Anka v. Miscevic v. Estate of M.M.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Munger v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.