BNSF Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TERRY R. MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the summary judgment motions of plaintiff BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) [doc. #35] and defendant United Transportation Union (“UTU”) [doc. # 32] and the motion for partial summary judgment of intervenor Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (“BLET”) [doc. # 37]. The Court concludes that BNSF’s claim that this case can be resolved by interpreting existing agreements is arguably justified. As a result, this case…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BNSF Railway Company v. Internal Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation DivisionDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012