Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Black Mountain Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Cubiam.

Tbe plaintiff, who was 73 years of age, and deaf, attempted to cross tbe track of defendant at a public crossing near Mica-ville.. In describing tbe manner of bis injury, plaintiff said: “I never paid much attention, but I looked up tbe road, and I went to step up on tbe road and didn’t know anything then. . . . When I was within five feet of tbe cross-ties I could see down tbe track . .' . about 200 feet. . . . I wasn’t paying much attention, and I expect I couldn’t bear that noise made by tbe engine pushing those ears around that curve, up grade. I reckon I didn’t look that time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Chicago Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Elder v. Plaza RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Pope v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. . JeffreysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Jeffries v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API