Legal Opinion

Jeffries v. . Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1942PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

In considering tbe challenge to tbe correctness of tbe ruling of tbe court below in sustaining motions of defendants, respectively, for judgments as of nonsuit at tbe close of' all tbe evidence, C. S., 567, “defendant’s evidence, unless favorable to the plaintiff, is not to be taken into consideration, except wben not in conflict witb tbe plaintiff’s evidence, it may be used to explain or make clear tbat wbicb bas been offered by tbe plaintiff.” Harrison v. R. R., 194 N. C., 656, 140 S. E., 598; Hare v. Weil, 213 N. C., 489, 196 S. E., 848; Sellars v. Bank, 214 N. C., 300, 199 S. E., 266;…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Mattingly v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Montgomery v. BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API